criteria for awards at wsp shows
criteria for awarding the aape"gold awards of honor"the purpose of this award is to recognize and encourage exhibitors who have worked hard for excellence of presentation but who have not been awarded the show gold medal. if possible, the aape gold awards of honor should be given to two different award levels. in other words, aape would like to have excellence in presentation rewarded regardless of the medal level of the exhibits that win them. this is not an award that should automatically go to the higher medal levels. for example, if there are five levels of awards, it is possible that a bronze exhibit and a silver exhibit each be awarded an aape gold award of honor. in addition, the two awards should be presented as equal awards, not as 锟絘ape gold award of honor first锟?and 锟絘ape gold award of honor second锟?aape asks that the aape gold awards of honor be awarded to the two exhibits that best exemplify the high standards of philatelic exhibition presentation per the following criteria:
criteria for awarding the aape"creativity in philatelic exhibiting medal"creativity should be shown in one or (preferably) more of these categories:
the award will be given only if there is an eligible, clearly recognizable candidate. criteria for awarding the aape
|
- home
- news
- organization
- join/renew
-
aape awards
- aape awards
- sapphire award
- diamond award
- ruby award
- hennig award
- herdenberg award
- neil & jennings awards
- award of honor - gold
- award of honor - silver
- first time exhibitor award
- creativity award
- the george brett award
- benninghoff award
- treatment award
- headings (discontinued)
- title page (discontinued)
- epilogue (discontinued)
- youth c of c
- critique services
- single frame c of c
- exhibiting
- philatelic links
- the philatelic exhibitor
- open forum forms
- women exhibitors
- contact form